[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: SAX/C++: GCJ and CNI
>>>>> David Brownell <david-b@p...>: > Steinar Bang wrote: >> >> >>>>> David Brownell <david-b@p...>: >> Well,... personally I'll follow the binding that David Megginson and >> James Clark finally comes up with, no matter what it looks like >> (ie. no matter whether I like everything in it or not). > Lots of folk will make similar choices. I heard voices already > pointing out they couldn't use a binding that didn't work on their > old funky nonstandard "C++" system, for example, I've made a lot of noises like that, which is why I've felt the need to make my position clear a couple of times. I wouldn't want my objections to slow down of convergence towards a standard. [snip!] > p.s. No comments on the CNI binding itself? Umm... I think I would prefer something more native C++-like as the final standard. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|