[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++

• From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 25 Dec 1999 10:21:48 +0100

>>>>> Steve Harris <seh@s...>:

> I know we need to get work done today, but it's sad that we can't
> use more of the Standard C++ pieces in a project like this. If we're
> successful, this API will outlast the current rev of the lagging
> compilers. I'm still in favor of planning an API that may not work
> for everyone today.

I'm very much in agreement with this.  I agree with this, even if it
won't work as-is with my current set of platforms.

<position-statement>
In any case: no matter what objections I raise on this list, and no
matter how big or large a feature set of Standard C++ is used, I will
move my own little SAX implementation to as close as what is finally
decided, as my platforms will allow.
</position-statement>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: Steve Harris <sharris@p...>
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: Steve Harris <seh@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why not PIs for namespace declarations?
• Next by Date: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Previous by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread