[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
>>>>> James Clark <jjc@j...>: > - Would it be better to typedef SAXString to the Standard C++ string > class (ie std::basic_string<SAXChar>)? An argument for using typdef const SAXChar* SAXString; is that you get late construction of the basic_string<>, ie. you don't create it until you have to (eg. when using it to do a lookup in an STL map<>). But ven if it's not used directly on the SAX interface, such a typedef would be useful when handling the data (eg. for creating the above mentioned map<>). xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|