[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Musing over Namespaces

• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 08:50:19 -0800

My thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread.

Some of you thought I am proposing removal of namespace.
I am not.  What I am doing is trying to see what lies
beyond our technical concerns.  I do not accept that
the current standardization practice is the best one,
just better than before, and I believe we focus too
much on logic and not enough on the big picture, the
one that astronauts see when they look at Earth from
out of space.

I think the real question I am asking is: What if we
were coerced into proactive standardization?  What
do we lose and what do we gain?

The registry/dictionary I mentioned is a form of
coercion.  Appropriate amount of anarchy can be
introduced with distributed architecture similar
to DNS.  XML-DEV old timers might recognize that
this distributed name registry network is similar
to the TagNet idea I wrote briefly about two years
ago.  Looks like I am going around in circles. <g>

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Musing over Namespaces
    • From: Ray Waldin <rwaldin@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Musing over Namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: SAX for WAP binary XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Musing over Namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: Musing over Namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread