[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2

• From: uche.ogbuji@f...
• To: David Megginson <david@m...>
• Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 14:16:01 -0700

> I'd like to hear what others think on this issue.  There was some
> interest in SAX2 when I posted my alpha interfaces a few months back
> (most notably, but not exclusively, from David Brownell), but it was
> hardly a tidal wave.  On the other hand, I am noticing a building
> pressure from implementors to get something out in C++.

Have you considered that the lack of heavy discussion after you posted the 
SAX2 alpha was because of its high quality?  There is little to argue with.  
The Python/XML group was able to hammer out a Python binding based on your 
alpha in short order.  We have put this to practical use in 4XSLT, and it 
works very well.  I don't think there needs to be a lot more dicussion on the 
way to SAX 2.0, but I hardly think that minimizes its importance.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji
FourThought LLC, IT Consultants
uche.ogbuji@f...	(970)481-0805
Software engineering, project management, Intranets and Extranets
http://FourThought.com		http://OpenTechnology.org



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by Date: Re: [YML] Re: YML: A Grand Unification of SAX and DOM? (fwd)
• Previous by thread: RE: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
• Next by thread: Re: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread