[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RFC: "even simpler" C++ XML parser for object hierarchies

• From: Paul Miller <stele@f...>
• To: Bent Rasmussen <runnable@h...>
• Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 12:38:12 -0500

> >               Layer *layer = new Layer((*it).GetAttribute("name"));
> >               layer->Parse(*it);
> >               doc->AddLayer(layer);

> Why do you call a parse method outside of Layer? The parse method might be
> there but it seems to me that giving the constructor the whole DOM node will
> reduce complexity and since it is implied that the object should use the
> information during construction to build its internal state - it might as
> well just start off by parsing the node during the actual construction. If

That's a good point. One advantage to doing it this way is your objects
do not *necessarily* need to know anything about the actual parsing
mechanism. You can call an object parser that parses out the required
attributes and entities on behalf of the object, and then call normal
object methods to get it into the state you want.

Both ways could be utilized trivially.

--
Paul Miller - stele@f...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: RFC: "even simpler" C++ XML parser for object hierarchies
    • From: "Bent Rasmussen" <runnable@h...>

• Prev by Date: RE: A processing instruction for robots
• Next by Date: Schema validation of XSLT, SVG, XPath: Part 2: Multiple Lexical Representation
• Previous by thread: Re: RFC: "even simpler" C++ XML parser for object hierarchies
• Next by thread: SML and I18N
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread