[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XFM (or something similar)
Sean McGrath wrote: > >Do xml-dev'ers think XFM is a good idea? Tim Bray replied: > I think having a way for an instance to promise it references no external > entities is a no-brainer. [ ... snip ... ] Should we invent yet another way for the instance to tell us about itself? We already have the BOM, the XML declaration, the Document Type declaration, and the XML-Stylesheet PI. I guess it hasn't been decided how an instance is associated with a W3C Schema. Maybe we should investigate a more general way to specify all this stuff externally. It seems to fit within the scope of the problem Tim outlines in "Related-Resource Discovery for XML" [1]. Is there a W3C XML packaging activity? Best, Bill [1] http://www.textuality.com/xml/why-pkg.html xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|