[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Musing over Namespaces
Eiland, David wrote: > > While the conversation has primarily focused on the Company > (Organization) level, it is my experience working with the Fortune 500 that > the same name is often used differently between departments/functions. Then > considering buying/selling of other divisions/companies that periodically > occurs, the Namespace mechanism must be fluid. Precisely. Views were proposed originally with that in mind. Consider a project as a performance in which processes are controlled via the visibility of nested views. A WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) is that. Treat it dynamically. Each level of that organization (not really a pure nesting but for the sake of discussion) has responsibilities for opening and closing processes and proving a valid performance by proving a valid deliverable. Any systems engineer is familiar with the models needed. XML is just another means of enabling a loose coupling among the systems. In the days when this was proposed using SGML (late eighties), there were not only concerns about the buying and selling, but organizing performances across cultures as well. The model writ large has aspects of real time systems design. len xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|