[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] [YML] Re: YML: A Grand Unification of SAX and DOM? (fwd)
Paul, I didn't get this at all. Sorry. On Sat, 4 Dec 1999, Paul Tchistopolskii wrote: > There is also *very* elegant > 'reverse-polish-notation' approach > proposed by Robert ( process > element when Grove is in place, > providing the execution stack ). > > Not sure he was talking about the > execution stack, it was my attempt to > understand how could it work. > > The only drawback of such a view > is that the execution stack constantly > grows and we need to clean it up > sometimes. > > However. > > Because mutithreading approach should > have the same drawback, I think that the > workaround should already exist in the > source code of SP ( thanks to Sean for > pointing that SP is an existing implementation > of multithreading approach ). > > No namespaces, no extra markup - > just smart cleanup ( could be easier > than look-ahead, because the information > to make a descision is already 'in place', > right? ) I'm talking about using a low-level recursive binary distinction in syntax to unify the behavior of SAX and DOM -- without *any* schema knowledge of the input stream known by the parser author, nor requiring any external processing guidelines. Clark xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|