[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: UTF-8 vs UTF-16...? (Was: Feeling good about SML)
Tim Bray writes: >In terms of actual usability, there's effectively no difference between >UTF-16 and UTF-8. UTF-16 seems to be an easier sell in Japan for reasons >that I've not fully understood. Many Japanese prefer UTF-8 to UTF-16, but I don't. I prefer UTF-16, since XML documents in legacy encodings never parse as UTF-16 and those in UTF-16 never parse as legacy encodings. On the other hand, they may parse as UTF-8 and lead to corrupted outputs. As Tim knows very well, UTF-16 has a number of problems about byte ordering. On the other hand, UTF-8 it not free from such problems. UTF-8 from Microsoft appears to begin with the zero-width non-breaking space always ;-( Makoto Fuji Xerox Information Systems Tel: +81-44-812-7230 Fax: +81-44-812-7231 E-mail: murata.makoto@f... xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|