[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Feeling good about SML

• From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• To: "XML Dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 01:15:50 -0500

Rick Jelliffe wrote:

> But why this endless "not invented here" desire to reinvent XML. It is
> still a mystery too me.  The complication in the XML world is not XML
> 1.0, but namespaces 

Amen!

> (which means that an element names may mean
> different things in different contexts) and class-based schemas (which
> can mean that even within a namespace a name may mean different things
> depending on context).  Anyone who thought DTDs were hard may be in for
> a shock unless we are careful!

Isn't that water already under the bridge?


/Jelks


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Feeling good about SML
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: About templates
• Next by Date: RE: facts, conclusions, and exhortations re XML (long)
• Previous by thread: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Next by thread: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread