[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: DTD Question - PCDATA followed by an optional element

• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 10:52:00 +0800

From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

>> I have a large number of fields that normally hold simple textual
data, but
>> might also include a comment.
>
>You can't constrain the content in that way with a DTD.  The best you
>do is
>
>    <!ELEMENT rho0 (#PCDATA|comment)*>
>
>which allows any mixture of comments and text.

To get strong typing you either must

1)explicitly label the text section:
    <!ELEMENT rho0 (text, comment?)>
    <!ELEMENT text (#PCDATA)>

or
2) use some other schema language to validate: use a DTD with Richard's
    <!ELEMENT rho0 (#PCDATA|comment)*>

Then the following Schematron schema to check that only one comment is
used (I think this is correct, I haven't run it):
<schema><title>Norman's Schema</title>
    <pattern name="Rho0 Pattern">
        <rule context="rho0">
            <assert text="count(comment) &lt;= 1"
            >An rh0 element should have only one comment</assert>
        </rule>
    </pattern>
</schema>

You can download schematron-report, which is an error browser generating
HTML pages, from
http://www.ascc.net/xml/resource/schematron/schematron.html

Rick Jelliffe


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Parser compliance
• Next by Date: Re: Do SGML and XML co-exist?
• Previous by thread: Re: DTD Question - PCDATA followed by an optional element
• Next by thread: Grafting DOM on a C++ XML parser?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread