[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: What do XML consultants actually do?
David Megginson writes (of a proposed simplified XML): > God! If I were paid to help people figure out XML syntax, I would be > way, way, way, WAY overpaid. What companies hire consultants for is > to help them understand how to exchange and process information: 90% > of the complexity comes from the nature of the information they're > trying to model and the business environment in which they work, 9.9% > of the complexity comes from finding, learning, and integrating the > software components, and perhaps the remaining 0.1% has something to > do with the syntax of the markup layer (but probably not). So in a $1 million project, perhaps $1,000 of the effort goes to things like implementing DTDs, verifying that input is in the correct form, fixing bugs in outputting XML, etc.? Sounds reasonable, if perhaps a little low. But maybe the projects you're working on are much bigger and harder than the ones I'm familiar with. In fact, that seems quite likely. I suggest that the most important projects are the small ones. ArborText is undoubtedly tremendously significant, and no doubt the syntax of SGML contributes very little to its complexity. But the significance of Arbortext is outweighed by the hundreds of little XML programs people have hacked up -- programs that would never have been attempted if understanding SGML were a prerequisite. Procter & Gamble makes more money than Giddings & Lewis[0] -- fifty times as much, in fact -- and directly benefits thousands of times as many people with its products, despite G&L's products arguably providing much more benefit per dollar. This is because the commitment required to profit from P&G's products is trivial, so more people do it. You don't need to know anything and you don't need to spend any significant amount of money. (Maybe someone else can come up with a better comparison; P&G vs. G&L is about as apples-and-oranges as it gets.) [0] Actually, they apparently got bought out by "TAQU" in 1997, after losing money. I'm comparing P&G's 1998 revenues with G&L's 1996 revenues. -- <kragen@p...> Kragen Sitaker <http://www.pobox.com/~kragen/> The Internet stock bubble didn't burst on 1999-11-08. Hurrah! <URL:http://www.pobox.com/~kragen/bubble.html> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|