[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Parser compliance

• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 17:38:22 -0800

David Megginson wrote:

>In XML, I've noticed that most of my consulting work has to do with
>designing running systems and integrating components, and that
>document-type design is only a small (though important) part of that.

Aye.  When prospective clients ask me to write their DTD, I tell them
that the design of XML-based systems require looking at the big picture
of component integration and data flow.  DTD is just 'what' but there
are 'how', 'where', 'when', etc. to consider.  Often times, DTD is just
used for documentation.

Too bad that my comments often taken as an attempt to increase the size
of the bill.  Not that I am entirely innocent, of course. <g>

Best,

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Parser compliance
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>

• References:
  • Re: Parser compliance
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: UTF-8 vs UTF-16...? (Was: Feeling good about SML)
• Next by Date: Re: Do SGML and XML co-exist?
• Previous by thread: Re: Parser compliance
• Next by thread: Re: Parser compliance
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread