[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: A Plea for Schemas

• From: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liamquin@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 14:49:30 -0500 (EST)

On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> We need the equivalent of the XML Stylesheet declaration (PI) so that
> alternative schemas can be available  (perhaps with one being the
> canonical schema) and so that use of a document is not dependent on
> buying into a particular schema language.

If you want every XML system to understand a schema, then you need
a different model.  You need a single VERY simple core schema language
that all XML 1.2 (say) validating processors are *required* to understand,
and make it extensible.

Otherwise one person will use SQL, another tcl, another LISP s-exprs,
another PROLOG Horn Clauses, and there will be no interoperability.

And XML is all about inteoperability.

The XML Stylesheet declaration, by the way, should have been done with
XLink.  The fact that an XML document does not use the XML linking
mechanism for links to its DTD and components indicates a problem.

In our case, the problem is that XLink wasnt invented, of course.

Lee

-- 
Liam Quin, Barefoot Computing, Toronto;  The barefoot agitator
l i a m q u i n     at    i n t e r l o g    dot   c o m
Ankh on irc.sorcery.net


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: A Plea for Schemas
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A Plea for Schemas
• Next by Date: Re: A Plea for Schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: A Plea for Schemas
• Next by thread: Re: A Plea for Schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread