[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Towards an XML Parser Compliance Table Version:17-11-99-15:16

• From: <schen@f...>
• To: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@i...>
• Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 11:41:55 -0500 (EST)

Hi Sean, everyone,

David Brownell already wrote up a nice article about this at:
http://www.xml.com/pub/1999/09/conformance/index.html
which I can't get to at the moment.

His test driver can be found at http://home.pacbell.net/david-b/xml/

>From memory:

On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Sean Mc Grath wrote:

> Fully 1.0 Compliant - Non Validating
> -------------------------------------
4. Sun ProjectX

> Fully XML 1.0 Compliant - Validating
> ------------------------------------
2. Sun ProjectX

> Non XML 1.0 Compliant - Non-Validating
> --------------------------------------
aelfred
DataChannel
Microsoft
IBM XML4J
IBM XML4C


> Non XML 1.0 Compliant - Validating
> ----------------------------------
> nsgmls (C++)
> xmlproc (Python)

IBM XML4J
IBM XML4C (? I think)

-------------
BTW, I think a more useful table would include what other features the
parsers have, rather than just a strict compliance/validating judgement.

Example features to consider would be: parser size (why I use aelfred),
parser speed (why XP is a good choice), language supported (Java/C/C++),
DOM1 support, DOM2 support, SAX support, SAX2 support, namespace support,
external entities support, memory usage, maximum file size supported,
and last but not least character set encodings supported.

(Note that there are add-on utilities to graft DOM and SAX2 support to
various popular parsers too)

. . . Sean (not related =)



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Towards an XML Parser Compliance Table Version:17-11-99-15:16
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • Towards an XML Parser Compliance Table Version:17-11-99-15:16
    • From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DTD Question - PCDATA followed by an optional element
• Next by Date: Re: UTF-8 vs UTF-16...? (Was: Feeling good about SML)
• Previous by thread: Towards an XML Parser Compliance Table Version:17-11-99-15:16
• Next by thread: Re: Towards an XML Parser Compliance Table Version:17-11-99-15:16
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread