[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language)

• From: William Lindsey <lindsey@d...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 01:17:44 -0700 (MST)

Ken MacLeod writes:

>   {foo this is a foo, {subfoo this is subfoo.}
>    This is {subfoo{=bar with an attribute}}.}

Proposals for similar concrete syntaxes were discussed
during XML's development.  I'm satisfied with the result.

People interested in the idea of using S-Expressions
may be interested in an SGML markup language I defined 
a while back. The concrete syntax appears so close
to Scheme, that a document actually can be run by an R5RS
interpreter, yet is also valid SGML.

http://www.blnz.com/lml


Enjoy,

Bill





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language)
    • From: Ken MacLeod <ken@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language)
• Next by Date: Re: SML answers for SML problems
• Previous by thread: Re: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language)
• Next by thread: Re: Feeler for SML (Simple Markup Language)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread