[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Feeling good about SML

• From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@e...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 21 Nov 1999 23:06:48 -0500

> 1. SML shall be easier to learn than XML
> 
> Ideally, one should be able to learn the ins and outs of SML
> COMPLETELY within 30 minutes.  Amount of time spent is not
> important but it can be used to indirectly measure the level of
> required attention span, mental model complexity, amount of
> details one must remember, etc.

I think that making the syntax trivial to learn is the least
of the problem. The real issues lie in applicability and
in the problems XML is being applied to. Even today it doesn't
require a lot of work to apply XML to a problem... but then
again, it takes a fair amount of skill to apply XML to the
problem *meaningfully*.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Feeling good about SML
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: No Subject
• Next by Date: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Previous by thread: RE: Feeling good about SML
• Next by thread: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread