[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: [SML] RE: Forget SML. We need RTSML.
Joe Lapp wrote: > I don't understand this proposal. You can't represent > structured data with > it. What am I missing? Good point. What we need is some way of nesting RSTML documents inside each other. Now that RSTML has been operating for over a day with good feedback from users (no-one has said they don't understand it) I think it's time to enhance the feature-set. I propose that we allow an RSTML document to contain other RSTML documents: document ::= StartTag (Stuff | document) EndTag StartTag ::= '<RTSML>' EndTag ::= '</RTSML>' One other thing; I'm organising a conference on RSTML. There won't actually be any sessions or even an event, since the idea is that if anyone actually wants to attend the conference then RSTML is obviously too complicated to understand in 3 minutes (recall from 1.0 that "RSTML 'MUST' be understood in less time than it takes to boil an egg"). If even one ticket is sold RSTML would need to be revised, and so the conference would have to be cancelled. The conference won't be on December 12th. Everyone OK with that date? Best regards, Mark Author - Building E-commerce and Satellite Control Systems with RSTML (Next year) xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|