[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SGML, XML and SML

• From: Sean McGrath <digitome@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 08:32:03 +0000

[Dan Brickley]
>
>What goes around comes around! The RDF Interest Group [1] is currently
>discussing alternate syntaxes for RDF in XML. Sounds like we're being
>told we'd be better off returning to PICS-NGesque s-expressions.

Not so AFAIK. I would be interested to read the XML-DEV posts that
have lead you to this conclusion. Can you point me at them?

regards,



<Sean uri="http://www.digitome.com/sean.html">
Developers Day co-Chair WWW9, April 2000, Amsterdam
<uri>http://www.www9.org</uri>
</Sean>



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SGML, XML and SML
    • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>

• References:
  • Re: SGML, XML and SML
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: SGML, XML and SML
    • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Next by Date: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Previous by thread: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Next by thread: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread