[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Feeling good about SML

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@i...>, xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 08:40:42 -0800

At 11:54 AM 11/16/99 +0000, Sean Mc Grath wrote:
>I see this as nothing more than codifying existing
>practice. There are lots of parsers that claim
>to be XML parsers but when you look closely they
>don't do X,Y and Z per the specification.

Is that really true?  The parsers out there in the field seem to 
make heroic efforts to cross all the t's and dot all the i's.

 -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Feeling good about SML
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: W3C releases XPath and XSLT Recommendations
• Next by Date: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Previous by thread: RE: Feeling good about SML
• Next by thread: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread