[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Parser compliance
(Sorry for the lateness of this posting. Due to problems with my subscription it didn't arrive the first time I tried.) * Sean Mc Grath | | Fully 1.0 Compliant - Non Validating | ------------------------------------- | | 2. XT RXP (C, Python) probably belongs here. | Fully XML 1.0 Compliant - Validating | ------------------------------------ Java Project X (the Sun parser). | Non XML 1.0 Compliant - Non-Validating | -------------------------------------- | nsgmls (C++) | xmlproc (Python) xmllib (Python) sgmlop (Python) Ælfred (Java) (though David Brownell's version gets pretty close) xml4j (Java) (now Xerces-Java) XJParser (Java) AdvXMLParser (C++) Markup (Objective Caml) | Non XML 1.0 Compliant - Validating | ---------------------------------- | nsgmls (C++) | xmlproc (Python) xml4j (Java) (now Xerces-Java) XJParser (Java) Should we quantify how many of the tests in the OASIS suite a parser may fail (excluding those on which the jury is still out)? Given that there are 1065 tests, what should be considered acceptable? 1065? 1060? 1050? 1000? Looking at the conformance review on xml.com requiring 1065 and 1060 would only accept the Sun parser, whereas 1050 and 1000 would accept the Sun parser and XP. --Lars M. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|