[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML trade off 1 - DTD vs XML Schema

• From: MURATA Makoto <murata.makoto@f...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 18:49:27 +0900

Paul Prescod <paul@p...> wrote:

>Why bother sending any schema information *at all*? If the first system
>has the schema and the document, why doesn't it just validate before
>passing the information to the second system? If the second system,
>conversely, can only deal with information that adheres to certain
>rules, then why wouldn't it supply the schema itself. It knows what
>those rules are!

The current working draft of XSDL introduced "information set contribution";  
a *lot* of information in schemata is exposed to application programs.  Therefore, 
you need to use a schema-ware processor and download the schema.  Moreover, you 
need some new APIs which can capture "information set contribution".  Otherwise, 
you cannot really use XSDL.

Makoto
 
Fuji Xerox Information Systems
 
Tel: +81-44-812-7230   Fax: +81-44-812-7231
E-mail: murata@a...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: XML for newbies WEB page
• Next by Date: How to get the text kept between two html tags
• Previous by thread: RE: XML trade off 1 - DTD vs XML Schema
• Next by thread: re: XMLNews-Meta and XMLNews-Story
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread