[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: weak validation
At 11:55 AM 8/30/99 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >>'weak validation' or 'weak conformance' has been discussed at length, and >>found to be a very, very bad idea. > >I find answers like this hazardous. 'has been discussed at length' by who? > The usual band of folks who who have used SGML for the decade or more? Or >by developers looking for a way to use schemas without binding themselves >into a straitjacket? Part of the problem here is what is and what isn't confidential discussions in a WG. If this were a W3C-internal list, I could be more forthcoming, but as I said earlier, I tend to err on the side of caution there. As for XHTML 1.0 -- being a reformulation of HTML 4.0 into XML, the black and white valid or not stance remained. As to future work.....I can only comment on public drafts. Ann --- Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials Coming in September --- Mastering XML Founder, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org Director, HWG Online Education http://www.hwg.org/services/classes xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|