[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XML trade off 1 - DTD vs XML Schema
Don Park wrote: > > document - you just pass a 'sub-set' of the schema (which is still > > itself a valid schema). > > Thus we end up with "XML Schema Fragment" (XML Schema + XML > Fragment). Has > anyone actually tried doing this? I am interested in knowing > any serious > issues. Er ... no you don't. (It might be worth revisiting the raging debate about fragments from a few months ago.) The technique I have used means it is always a complete schema, if it only represents a sub-set of some larger schema. Regards, Mark xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|