[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
RE: Unix/Java design issues (Was: Re: Is CDATA "structure"?)
- From: Blair Murri <BMurri@w...>
- To: xml-dev@i...
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 13:12:21 -0600
Title: RE: Unix/Java design issues (Was: Re: Is CDATA "structure"?)
-----Original Message-----
From: Hunter, David [SMTP:dhunter@M...]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 12:48 PM
To: xml-dev@i...
Subject: RE: Unix/Java design issues (Was: Re: Is CDATA "structure"?)
Windows NT is perfectly Unicode aware, and I routinely view XML documents in
Notepad on my NT box. All of the characters are fine, with the only problem
being the LF-CRLF-CR problem that started this thread in the first place. I
am 87% sure that Windows 95 uses the windows-1250 or windows-1252 character
set internally, although it may also have some level of Unicode awareness.
(I'm not sure about that.) And I haven't the faintest idea what character
set Windows 98 uses natively, although I'd like to hope that it's Unicode.
Windows 98 is like Windows 95, but here is the kicker -- both can convert from the codepage that they are setup with to/from unicode. This is significant because COM on Win9x as well as NT is *ALL* unicode internally (thus, MS's DOM (being a COM object) does everything internally in unicode all the time (although I must plead ignorance as to its usage of the LF-CRLF-CR thing that this thread is about).
Blair L. Murri
Sr. Programmer/etc.
WavePhore, Inc.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0 |
|
Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|