[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Standards: they're de-jure, they're de-facto, they're de-LOVELY!

• From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• To: "'XML Dev'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 10:53:43 -0700

> I've never (knowingly) called SAX a 'standard', de facto or de jure.
> What *is* it?

IMHO, it is a standard in the traditional sense.

1 : a conspicuous object (as a banner) formerly carried at the top of a pole
and used to mark a rallying point especially in battle or to serve as an
emblem
2 a : a long narrow tapering flag that is personal to an individual or
corporation and bears heraldic devices b : the personal flag of the head of
a state or of a member of a royal family c : an organization flag carried by
a mounted or motorized military unit d : BANNER
3 : something established by authority, custom, or general consent as a
model or example : CRITERION
4 : something set up and established by authority as a rule for the measure
of quantity, weight, extent, value, or quality
5 a : the fineness and legally fixed weight of the metal used in coins b :
the basis of value in a monetary system
6 : a structure built for or serving as a base or support
7 a : a shrub or herb grown with an erect main stem so that it forms or
resembles a tree b : a fruit tree grafted on a stock that does not induce
dwarfing
8 a : the large odd upper petal of a papilionaceous flower (as the pea) b :
one of the three inner usually erect and incurved petals of an iris
9 : a musical composition (as a song) that has become a part of the standard
repertoire

I particularly like #9 although SAX is more like a good old drinking song.

Beers not included,

Don


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Standards: they're de-jure, they're de-facto, they're de-LOVELY!
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Lotsa laughs
• Next by Date: RE: Lotsa laughs
• Previous by thread: Standards: they're de-jure, they're de-facto, they're de-LOVELY!
• Next by thread: RE: Standards: they're de-jure, they're de-facto, they're de-LOVELY!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread