[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: A milestone in XML

• From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 16 May 1999 00:07:49 +0200

* Jeffrey Ricker
|
| Why did Netscape feel it necessary to invent RSS rather than use CDF
| as Microsoft, DataChannel, PointCast, etc. do?

When I first started looking at RSS I immediately noticed two things:

 a) it's incredibly simple (too simple, in fact)
 b) it's probably the most widely supported XML application so far,
    both in terms of software and content

To me this smells like worse-is-better again, and I think that's a
good answer to your question. 

I also think it's a useful lesson for the future. The success of most
non-local XML applications is entirely dependent on their adoption by
content providers, and previous experience seems to show that that
very much depends on how easy it is to support.

I would also conjecture that in most cases the software support
depends on the content support.

--Lars M.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: A milestone in XML
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Again wit da AND and Repetitions
• Next by Date: Re: Again wit da AND and Repetitions / Singletons in a DTD
• Previous by thread: RE: A milestone in XML
• Next by thread: RE: A milestone in XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread