[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Entities and Expat

• From: "Nik O" <niko@c...>
• To: "John Cowan" <cowan@l...>
• Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 12:06:13 -0600

Thanks much for the clarification.  Obviously, i need to go back to the
remedial XML syntax class, since i was forgetting to wrap the "<!ENTITY..>"
declarations within a "<!DOCTYPE..".

Unfortunately, i'm being given legacy documents that are "semi-well-formed"
XML.  My indexer program does have an input file list, so i'll just ensure
that the "<!DOCTYPE.." and "<!ENTITY..>" declarations and the root element
start-tag are included in the first input file, and the root element end-tag
is the last input file, with the untranslated content file(s) in between
these wrapper files.

I suppose an external DTD would be the preferred alternative, but i'm trying
to avoid DTDs, for now (or at least until i pass that remedial class).

-Nik O, Content Mgmt Solutions, Jackson, Wyo.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Confused about & in entity literal
    • From: roddey@u...
  • Re: Confused about & in entity literal
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
  • Entities and Expat (was Re: Confused about & in entity literal)
    • From: "Nik O" <niko@c...>
  • Re: Entities and Expat
    • From: "Nik O" <niko@c...>
  • Re: Entities and Expat
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: RE: minOccur, maxOccur
• Next by Date: Re: XLink: behavior must go!
• Previous by thread: Re: Entities and Expat
• Next by thread: Benchmark of 6 XML parsers on Linux
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread