[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

XML Validation Issues Revisited

• From: "WorldNet" <csgallagher@w...>
• To: "XML Developer" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 14:39:56 -0500

If this thread can stand to be revisited I would interject with a question
asking, "after all is said and done academically one needs to determine
one's personal investment regarding the value of all that has been or ever
would hope to be if there is going to be a subversion of the purpose of
validating documents"? Backwards compatibility is just that. Backwards.

Maybe somebody can 'splain it to Ricky? Why should anyone continue to work
to achieve the best that one can achieve when it is only to be subverted to
satisfy the ethos of the greedy stinking employers who comb their hair over
the side of their heads?


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Is XPointer dead?
• Next by Date: Re: Paul has volunteered (was Re: Overloaded URIs must GO!)
• Previous by thread: Is XPointer dead?
• Next by thread: Request for Comments: DOM Interface header for C available
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread