[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XLink: behavior must go!

• From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 12:03:48 -0400

At 06:23 AM 5/12/1999 -0500, Paul Prescod wrote:

  [pretty convincing arguments about problems in XLink as specified to date]

I've always thought of the XLink spec as a comprehensive blue-sky pastiche
of wonderful, imperfectly-workable ideas, and figured that with time it
would shake out to be, er, more perfectly workable. (And, granted, less
blue-sky.) The "hints" in the spec, I reckoned, were there as Post-It(tm)
reminders for authors of the next WD as much as for readers of the current
one. It's been a looong time between WDs, though; if it would help
accelerate the process then I'd be all for jettisoning the
behavior-specific bits of the spec (or transferring responsibility for them
to the style WGs).

OTOH, transplanting the burden won't necessarily accelerate resolution of
those Little Flaky Bits. Paul mentioned some problems inherent in
transclusion of foreign structures, for example. That's the one LFB I'd be
most interested in having and the one I'm least confident of ever
obtaining, in anything like perfect form. (This isn't meant as a knock on
the work of the Fragments WG by any means; it just seems impossible for
them to resolve *all* the transclusion LFBs, e.g. partial nodes, ID
clashes, etc.)

(Paul didn't mention this, but I also worry greatly about the
intellectual-property implications of auto/embed behavior, *especially* in
the absence of default style/rendering. This strikes me as a nifty
technological bauble with potentially far-reaching cultural impact.)
=============================================================
John E. Simpson          | It's no disgrace t'be poor, 
simpson@p...      | but it might as well be.
                         |            -- "Kin" Hubbard

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: XLink: behavior must go!
• Next by Date: RE: Dynamic HTML/PDF's
• Previous by thread: Re: auto/embed is not node transclusion
• Next by thread: XLink: behavior must go!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread