[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Do I need to use a validating parser?

• From: "Steve Oldmeadow" <smo@j...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 09:25:10 +0800

----- Original Message -----
From: Joshua E. Smith <jesmith@k...>
To: XML Developers' List <xml-dev@i...>
Sent: 05/05/1999 12:54
Subject: re: Do I need to use a validating parser?


> I really meant what I wrote.  I'm assuming that most programmers will not
> actually write in the markup language, but rather will use editors which
> produce markup as their output.  If you think about it, that's what's
> already happening with tools like Access or Delphi (users work in an
> editor, and for the most part, don't touch the code), and of course that's
> almost the only way anyone can deal with HTML anymore.
>
What sort of editor do you imagine?  If you are thinking of using an XML
editor constrained by the DTD then I think that would be a very clumsy way
of programming.

> Now consider what happens to your favorite ALGOL-derived language (say,
> Java) when you compile it.  It gets formatted by YACC into a parse tree.
> So represent the parse tree in XML to begin with, and get rid of the
> compiler front end.

I think you are getting confused with your compiler terminology.  The only
thing that I can see marking up your program using XML helping with is the
lexing stage i.e. recognising the tokens.  Using a DTD would help with some
syntax validation but I'm sure there are rules that you would want to
enforce that can't be expressed in the DTD.  Also think about what sort of
error messages you want to give back to the programmer and how well your
proposed solution will handle that.

> My language isn't anything like LISP or ALGOL, but I think this gets the
> point across.  It's pretty easy to write programming languages which are
> XML-Conformant.

You might be able to define a language easily but XML isn't going to help
with the interpretation.
At least using tools like yacc/lex, javac and antlr you can link the grammar
to what you want to do with the language which aids maintenance.  I agree
with David, I don't think programming languages marked up using XML is a
good way to go.  I know people are doing it but it strikes me as a case of a
man with a hammer thinking everything looks like a nail.

Steve Oldmeadow
Justice Systems Technologies


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Do I need to use a validating parser?
    • From: "Joshua E. Smith" <jesmith@k...>

• References:
  • Do I need to use a validating parser?
    • From: "Joshua E. Smith" <jesmith@k...>
  • re: Do I need to use a validating parser?
    • From: "Joshua E. Smith" <jesmith@k...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Do I need to use a validating parser?
• Next by Date: Re: Dreadfully tedious questions
• Previous by thread: Re: Do I need to use a validating parser?
• Next by thread: Re: Do I need to use a validating parser?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread