[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: multiple encoding specs (Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376)

• From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@e...>
• To: "'Chris Lilley'" <chris@w...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 18:29:56 -0400

> Can you post some URIs? Are you willing to share them? I would trust
> your servlets to be doing the right thing.

I can probably release these. I'll check. I also have a few other
bits of code that I'm trying to release.

> > I still dislike the encoding information in the PI....
>
> (it isn't, in theory, a PI although it looks exactly like one) I am of
> quite the opposite point of view - I think that it finally
> gives authors the ability to correctly label their documents.

Right. My opinion though is that is does the right thing in the
wrong place.

> The same is true of any label. The encoding declaration in the XML
> declaration at least always travels with the document, which is always
> handy for ensuring metadata doesn't get lost.

Right. The problem is really one of *metadata* not *data*, that is precisely
my point. The *.mim proposal provided an *explicit* separation of the two.
In retrospect, I must say that *.mim us also woefully insufficient... but
that we still need, in some form, a way of encoding, and transporting,
in an interoperable manner, the information (metadata) that is needed
by *processors* of the data.

> But if you are transcoding, you have to fix it anyway - so?

Right, but

  a) You have to fix it by parsing a peice of arbitrary syntax, which
     proxies etc. will most likely not do, for performance reasons.
  b) The XML declaration is part of the *document* as specified by
     the XML 1.0 recommendation, changing the XML declaration changes
     the *document*, which is a Bad Thing(tm).




xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: multiple encoding specs (Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376)
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>
  • Re: multiple encoding specs (Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376)
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>

• References:
  • Re: multiple encoding specs (Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376)
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Comments Appreciated on Magazine Based on XML/XSL
• Next by Date: Last Call for the XML Fragment Interchange Rec
• Previous by thread: Re: multiple encoding specs (Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376)
• Next by thread: Re: multiple encoding specs (Re: IE5.0 does not conform to RFC2376)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread