[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: SAX2 RFD: LexicalHandler draft v.1.1
David Megginson wrote: > > Possible solutions: > > > > - reject normalize-text true if a LexicalHandler has been registered, > > and reject LexicalHandler registration if normalize-text has been set > > to true > > - make normalize-text have a logical interpretation by default, and > > switch to lexical if a LexicalHandler has been registered > > - make normalize-text always have a lexical interpretation > > - have separate normalize-text-logical and normalize-text-lexical > > events, with reject-behaviour for the first > > The DOM's text-normalisation feature does *not* normalise CDATA > sections, but I think that SAX's should Do you mean always normalize CDATA or normalize CDATA in the absense of a LexicalHandler? I agree with the first case, but prefer Lars' second option (lexical interpretation of normalization) in the second case. By requesting normalize, the application has asked for a single call to character() between other calls. By registering a LexicalHandler, the application has stated it is still interested in lexical events. -- Ron Bourret xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|