[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)

• From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 16:23:35 +1000

At 23:53 19/03/1999 , David Megginson wrote:

  | Almost correct.  One expensive disadvantage of SGML (until WebSGML) is
  | that it requires full DTD conformance at every stage of production; as
  | a result, if your production chain consists of ten physical steps,
  | writing out SGML at each stage, you *must* have DTDs for all of the
  | intermediate steps.  This one constraint can add $100K or more to a
  | large enterprise SGML project, since DTD writers are expensive to hire
  | (and a single, configured DTD becomes heavily obfuscated so that it
  | can almost never be maintained in-house).

I'd like to take this point up.

Having done a transformation with 12 steps in the chain,
I would disagree that the DTD becomes a big problem.

If you're using a tool like Omnimark, you can choose
to view the document as SGML or text. In general, a
lot of the steps use the latter, with some simple
find-and-replace regexps.

So in practice, we just ended up with about 5 DTDs
that were very close to each other.

Not a lot of work.

And it did ensure that all was correct at
each stage, catching errors in a most satisfying
way.

Cheers,

James

-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@s...

"Beyond the Idea"
 ACN 081 019 623

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• References:
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: who's on the XML WG?
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: who's on the XML WG?
    • From: len bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: "Richard L. Goerwitz" <richard@g...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: Richard Goerwitz <richard@g...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Unsubscibing
• Next by Date: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Next by thread: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread