[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why is this JC test not-wf?

• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• To: roddey@u...
• Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 01:30:33 GMT

> Its too bad he doesn't have a
> listing of what he thinks is wrong with each file and why.

How true.

So I have put up a web page showing the error messages rxp produces for
each not-well-formed test.  It's at

 http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~richard/jjc-test-errors.html

I apologise for the poor quality of the error messages in cases where
there are illegal characters in the document; this will be improved
some day.

-- Richard

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: XCatalog
• Next by Date: Re: who's on the XML WG?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why is this JC test not-wf?
• Next by thread: Re: XCatalog
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread