[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: SAX2 RFD: LexicalHandler draft v.1.1
>The problem is that even if you don't care about entity boundaries, >the XML 1.0 REC requires reporting of any entities that are not >expanded (in the case, for example, of a non-validating parser that >hasn't read the declaration in the external DTD subset). As a result, >in a literal reading of the spec, a fully-conformant XML 1.0 API can >*never* treat attribute values simply as strings. SAX 1.0 does so, >and no one has ever minded, but conformance is conformance... The XML REC uses the word 'report' a lot but wisely does get into what reporting means. I think that as long as the information is available on-demand through one mechanism or another, we can consider the reporting requirement met. Don xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|