[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)

• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 15:51:11 +1100

From: David Megginson <david@m...

>In SGML, you have to write a special program to act on the information
>in the data attributes (nothing does this out of the box); in XML, you
>have to write a special program to act on the PUA.

Huh? OmniMark allows access to data attributes just as easily as element
attributes (http://www.omnimark.com/develop/om40/doc/concept/646.htm),
out of the box. Several CALS-aware tools understand the notations used
in data attributes, e.g.,  when used for graphics.

And I dont agree that elements and characters and attributes and
entities should be thought of  as interconvertable: search routines look
for character codes--I don't know of any search routines which allow
grepping on data and elements.

Rick Jelliffe





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • A Line in the Declarative Syntax Sand(Was: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG))
    • From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@i...>
  • Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
    • From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Next by Date: LocalMarkupFilter (was Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG))
• Previous by thread: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Next by thread: Re: XML complexity, namespaces (was WG)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread