[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why SAX needs namespace support
Why not permit the application to bind an instance to perform the respective operations. It's more powerful and no harder to implement or to use? david@m... wrote: > > Michael.Kay@i... writes: > > > Perhaps a setOption(option, flag) interface would be more extensible. > > I could live with this, but only if the options were namespace > qualified, i.e. > > try { > parser.setOption("http://xml.org/sax/features/validation", true); > parser.setOption("http://xml.org/sax/features/namespaces", false); > parser.setOption("http://xml.org/sax/features/entity-expansion", true); > parser.setOption("http://simonstl.org/ns/sax/xlink", true); > } catch (SAXUnsupportedFeatureException e) { > System.err.println("This parser ain't up to snuff -- try another!"); > } > xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|