[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Why SAX needs namespace support
Michael.Kay@i... writes: > > > Perhaps a setOption(option, flag) interface would be more > > extensible. > > > > I could live with this, but only if the options were namespace > > qualified, i.e. > > > > parser.setOption("http://xml.org/sax/features/validation", true); > > parser.setOption("http://xml.org/sax/features/namespaces", false); > > > I'm all for fully qualified names, but I don't see why we should repeat the > error of using "http://" names for things that are not accessible via the > HTTP protocol. What's wrong with > "org.xml.sax.option.validation"? That's fine for Java, but since it's based on DNS anyway, why develop a general solution that uses a slightly different notation? All the best, David -- David Megginson david@m... http://www.megginson.com/ xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|