[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: CDATA by any other name... (was The raw and the cooked)
> From: Richard Tobin [mailto:richard@c...] > Surely the unanswerable argument against CDATA elements in XML was > they prevent you from parsing a document without the DTD. Just like > optional start/end tags, and unmarked empty elements. A good reason, but you could always say that "every CDATA element must have an attribute xml:content-mode='CDATA'". So not unanswerable (though neither <![CDATA[ ]]> nor the attribute commend themselves). And not unthinkable, as xml:lang and xml:space prove. Rick Jelliffe xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|