[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Internal subset equivalent in new schema proposals?
Paul Prescod wrote: > Argh. Documents are data. The dichotomy is in your head. Doesn't XML > itself makes this abundantly clear? Documents might be data, but the dichotomy is not just in our heads. XML has a clear bias towards linear, prose-oriented verbiage. How else to explain mixed content, the significance of order (as opposed to nesting), and the lack of basic data typing? Fortunately, XML is proving itself to be a good way to transport the kinds of data many of us think of when we hear the word "data". -- Ron Bourret xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|