[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Internal subset equivalent in new schema proposals?

• From: "Michael Kay" <M.H.Kay@e...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 09:39:01 -0000

Don Park wrote:
>I think inline schema is particularly important in applications like
digital
>television and smart cable boxes where content variation is tremendous.

I think inline schema is absolutely pernicious in such applications (which
is the area I am currently working in). The idea that a content author can
subvert the intentions of the content designer by modifying the schema on a
per-instance basis is too horrible to contemplate. There is an application
(perhaps in the set top box) that thinks it understands the structure of
things like the electronic programme guide, and that therefore relies on
today's guide conforming to the same schema as yesterday's.

Mike Kay


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Internal subset equivalent in new schema proposals?
• Next by Date: Re: Transports for XML Streaming?
• Previous by thread: RE: Internal subset equivalent in new schema proposals?
• Next by thread: Re: Internal subset equivalent in new schema proposals?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread