[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XObjects
From: Tyler Baker <tyler@i...> >> This again allow for greater integration with the DOM without either >> precluding or excluding the use of SAX. > >Is this a goal? Why should we be working with the DOM for DOM's sake. I just >don't see the reason why the DOM is necessary here and I consider it to be an >intermediary form of bloar. We may be driving towards fundamentally different things. I am not sure if there is a significant overlap. I see XObject as being founded in the DOM for navigation, with a set of bindings which transforms a document into a composition of components which themselves are an active aspect of the application: document + bindings + classes = application-specific agent This approach precludes many things. It is not generic to XML processing. Bill xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|