[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] XObject (was was was)
There seem to be a lot of problems with DOM: - an incomplete set of interfaces - excessive overhead for some applications. But from the perspective of a component programming environment, where each application object has a peer member (or is a member) of the DOM tree, there seems to be a big advantage: a standard navigation api. So having a standard for converting an application-specific document reference into application-specific elements of a DOM tree means that we have decoupled the application code from the tool that builds the DOM tree. It also then creates a standard new kind of component-- an XObject, which could be a really good thing indeed if they are easy to write. Bill xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|