[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

XML WG Reorganization questions

• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 11:28:45 -0500

Between XML.com's report (http://www.xml.com/xml/pub/98/10/xmlgroups.html)
and the XML Activity statement at the W3C
(http://www.w3.org/XML/Activity.html) I feel like I have a decent grasp of
where the W3C is headed with XML - better, at least, than I've had in a while.

Two big questions, however:

1) I don't see where namespaces are listed as any of these groups' work,
though the activity statement still mentions them as W3C work.

2) Is the Fragment Working Group the descendant of XPointer, or something
else?  XPointer started out with XLink, but seems to be migrating further
and further away from its origins.

Looks good!


Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth (November)
Building XML Applications (December)
http://www.simonstl.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • re: XML WG Reorganization questions
    • From: <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: there's empty, and then there's REALLY empty
• Next by Date: re: XML WG Reorganization questions
• Previous by thread: there's empty, and then there's REALLY empty
• Next by thread: re: XML WG Reorganization questions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread