[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Content v. attribute

• From: <david@m...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 06:32:23 -0500 (EST)

Don Park writes:

 > In other words, why not treat attributes as a specific type of
 > child element: unique and childless?

Actually, that might complicate processing far more than you think:

1. Attributes are inherently unordered and have no position relative
   to the element children; for any kind of iteration, you would have
   to provide fake positions for them and develop a rule to make those 
   positions consistent across different processors (if you're
   thinking of specifying that they be sorted in alphabetical order,
   remember the L10N issues).

2. Attributes are often meant to be ignored unless needed.  For
   example, if I have

   <!ATTLIST section
     html NMTOKEN #FIXED "div"
     id ID #REQUIRED
     security (public|confidential) "public"
     status (draft|released) "draft">

   and then

   <section id="foo">
   <title>Small Section</title>
   <para>This is a small section.</para>
   </section>

   do I really want to have to iterate through 'html', 'id',
   'security', and 'status' as well as 'title' and 'para' as my
   children?


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Content v. attribute
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Content v. attribute
• Next by Date: Re: Orgcharts
• Previous by thread: Re: Content v. attribute
• Next by thread: Re: Content v. attribute
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread