[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Mix encodings in a document?

• From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 14:50:29 -0400

Tony Graham scripsit:

> Surrogate pairs are not allowed in parsed entities.  The production
> for Char excludes the surrogate blocks:
> 
> [2] Char::= #x9 | #xA | #xD | [#x20-#xD7FF] | [#xE000-#xFFFD]
>             | [#x10000-#x10FFFF]

On the contrary.  UTF-16 is a standard representation that XML
systems must accept (clause 4.3.3), and the representation of the
characters #x10000-#x10FFFF in UTF-16 (which is the same as
Unicode 2.x) is precisely a surrogate pair.

Individual surrogate characters are excluded, but they have no meaning
in UTF-16 anyway.

> You can include non-BMP/non-UCS-2 characters by making numeric
> references to their Unicode Scalar Value (or by using UCS-4).

That works too.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan@c...
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Mix encodings in a document?
    • From: Deke Smith <deke@t...>
  • Re: Mix encodings in a document?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Ownership of Names (was Re: Public identifiers and topic maps)
• Next by Date: Re: Ownership of Names (was Re: Public identifiers and topic maps)
• Previous by thread: Re: Mix encodings in a document?
• Next by thread: Re: Mix encodings in a document?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread