[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML is boring (was Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd)

• From: Andrew Bunner <bunner@m...>
• To: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>, xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 09:03:57 -0700

>As far as I can see, most readers of this list are:
>	- waiting for XSL because all they are interested in is rendering text
>with infinite precision. Worthy, but surely that's not the main point of
>XML. Also it's a year away.

  XML/XSL is already making me a much happy web site manager. Different
views of the same data, data lives in one place... no pages that are
out-of-synch with each other, vastly improved human-readable code... 

  This application may not be exciting, but it sure is useful.

-- Andrew

   Andrew Bunner
   President, Founder Mass Quantities, Inc.
   Professional Supplements for the Perfect Physique
   http://www.massquantities.com 

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd (was re: namespaces)
    • From: "Richard L. Goerwitz III" <richard@g...>
  • Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd (was re: namespaces)
    • From: Paul Prescod <papresco@t...>
  • XML is boring (was Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd)
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: XML like JAVA, not HTML... was: XML *should* be boring
• Next by Date: Re: XML is boring (was Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd)
• Previous by thread: Re: RDF site maps back up
• Next by thread: Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd (was re: namespaces)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread