[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: coming clean with the SGML crowd (was re: namespaces)
At 05:23 PM 9/10/98 -0700, matt@v... wrote: >Given how you suggested people do validation with the current NS >proposal, it will be difficult to convince anyone that much thought >was given to validation in preparing it. I, of course, know better, >but an outsider looking at your recommended validation algorithm would >not be totally without justification in interpreting it as saying we >consider validation so important we will make it as difficult as >possible without making it outright IMpossible. :-) I repeat: all this noise about the difficulty of validation is completely missing the real point, namely we have neither a theoretical basis nor industry experience to guide us in constructing and using compound schemas (DTDs or any other sort), and doing partial validation. Maybe I'm missing something, but the syntactic difficulties in doing DTD validation just look infinitesimal to me compared to the compounding issue. -Tim xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|